• Welcome to the Lago Vista City Council Message Board. Only members of the Lago Vista City Council, Boards, Commissions, and Committees and authorized staff are allowed to post on this message board. Lago Vista City Council, Board, Commission, and Committee members may not vote or take any action that is required to be taken at a meeting by posting a communication on this message board. In no event shall a communication or posting on this message board be construed to be an action taken by Lago Vista City Council, Boards, Commissions, or Committees.

Tree Preservation Questions for 19708 Boggy Ford Rezoning

Commissioners,

I look forward to seeing everyone at this afternoon’s P&Z meeting. In advance of our discussion on the proposed rezoning at 19708 Boggy Ford Road, I want to share several concerns related to tree preservation as presented in the ordinance and its exhibits. I may add additional items later today as time permits.

After reviewing the Tree Preservation Plan, I noted that the tree IDs range from 16 to 361. If we assume the numbering begins at 1 and continues sequentially, this suggests:
  • At least 361 total trees were surveyed
  • 74 protected trees are proposed for removal
  • 26 protected trees are proposed to be retained
  • 100 protected trees total
  • Approximately 261+ unprotected trees are present but not listed individually in the plan
Based on the information provided, several key questions remain unanswered:
  • How many of the 261+ unprotected trees will be removed
  • The total number of trees (protected + unprotected) on the site
  • The total number of trees (protected + unprotected) proposed for removal
  • The total number of trees (protected + unprotected) proposed for preservation
  • How many replacement trees, if any, are being planted
Additionally, the proposed ordinance includes a cap of $10,000 per acre on tree mitigation fees. I am concerned about this provision, as our tree preservation code is designed to prioritize on‑site replacement of protected trees, with fees in lieu of replacement used only when replacement is not feasible. A fee cap may unintentionally weaken that intent.

Before we can fully understand the environmental and community‑character impacts of this proposed PDD, I believe we need clearer information on the complete tree inventory, removal totals, preservation totals, and replacement plan.

What are your thoughts on this?
 
Jeff, thank you for your careful and thorough review of the trees on the property in question.
Given the facts that you presented, please provide for Commission consideration the specific recommendation you will make at the hearing this afternoon regarding trees and tree mitigation fees.
 
Back
Top