Full Charter: Final Drafts

[Gene Harris]

couple of comments
Dis-annexation is used in the table of contents
line 121 Dis-annexation is used
line 127 appears as Disannexation
line 128 disannex is used
Spelling configuration should be consistent throughout the charter
line 241 add the word "the" to the sentence to read, "subject to the same", maintains consistency with following sentences

 

[Mark Douglas]

3rd format draft encompassing above feedback. Please disregard Article 12 in this document. We have not approved it yet and have a separate working draft going for approval Wednesday.

Are we sure we should keep the three November dates in the beginning, or are they simply placeholders?

 

[Mark Douglas]

Need a comma on line 233, after the word compensation.

 

[Mark Douglas]

Also need a comma on L234 after the determine.

Nitpicking. Sorry

 

[Mark Douglas]

L855 - agree w it GH. ‘Respective’ is not necessary.

 

[Mark Douglas]

&01.5

I will not agree to a final draft of this is not included.

 

[Mark Douglas]

9.18

This is a tough one for me. My church, RHCC, has a tremendous food pantry, that has zero to do with religion. It is Service to the community for those in need.

I believe the same template can apply to the Lions. A Christian based organization.

But neither are evangelical in their service. Both simply provide food to those in need.

 

[Mark Douglas]

FWIW I’m okay with leaving this up to CC - as written in 9.18

 

[Mark Douglas]

I still don’t believe 12.11 is necessary.

I certainly don’t believe 12.22.2 is necessary.

Nave that to state law.

I’m not convinced a chatter can legally Meter out penalties for criminal violations.

 

[Mark Douglas]

I am 100 percent behind 12.5 - requiring a CMP.

 

[Mark Douglas]

I am 100 percent in including the language of 12.4 as written.

 

[Mark Douglas]

12.18 - 3-7 members seems good. 5, seems perfect. Right in the middle.

‘At least’? Every five years seems reasonable. Good flexibility.

 

[Gene Harris]

&01.5

I will not agree to a final draft of this is not included.

what is &01.5?

 

[Gene Harris]

I still don’t believe 12.11 is necessary.

I certainly don’t believe 12.22.2 is necessary.

Nave that to state law.

I’m not convinced a chatter can legally Meter out penalties for criminal violations.

why wouldnt 12.11 be necessary? I have a guess but curious the reason.

what is 12.22.2?

 

[Gene Harris]

I am 100 percent behind 12.5 - requiring a CMP.

again I am lost, which copy of

 

[Mark Douglas]

‘Public Hearings Shall Be Held’. K 180 and 181.

Agree

what is &01.5?

No appointee May served I’m more than one of the quasi judicial boards.

 

[Gene Harris]

I am giving up on the discussion board, it has become so convoluted it is a royal pain to try and decipher.

 

[Mark Douglas]

what is &01.5?

Sorry. Typo. 8.01.5

what is &01.5?

No appointee May served on more than one of the quasi judicial boards.

 

[Mark Douglas]

why wouldnt 12.11 be necessary? I have a guess but curious the reason.

what is 12.22.2?

I believe I was reading the separate draft of article XII.

My fear now is we’re rushing to get this done without considering the consequences.

I agree. We’re all convoluted at this point.

IMO? We should wait another week or two To present this to CC at their next meeting.

 

[Jen Grunewald]

I am sympathetic to Lynda's concerns with the no-crossover provision. There is established law about dual-office holding, however deciphering that law gives the prospect of deciphering this discussion board a run for its money! I am not opposed to adding the no-crossover provision into the charter,