FLUM Maps (Comp Plan)

[Lynda Aird]

The large-sized updated maps requested at our February 12th meeting are now available for pick-up at Development Services. Please color and return them no later than Monday, February 23rd for our Special Called meeting on Thursday, February 25th.

 

[Gene Harris]

Dave Stewart and I came up with this marked up FLUM map with proposed land usage designations on top of the existing designations. Seemed easier and quicker to try it this way with the limited amount of time given to try and come up with a product.

 

[Dave Stewart]

It is not necessary to reinvent the wheel. Most of the crrent FLUM map needs no modification but some areas definately need to be looked at, particulary the large lakefront lots that should be rezoned to RR2.

 

[Lynda Aird]

The FLUM should be as uncomplicated as possible. Instead of "rural residential" in 3 tiers I suggest using the term "Light intensity residential" and having 2 tiers. "Civic Places," "Regional Commercial District," and "Employment & Service District" could be combined; "Scenic View & Corridor Preservation" could be eliminated (consider zoning overlay instead.) Also, the City has an ordinance intended to protect developing in transitions from one zoning category to another, is the "Neighborhood Transition" FLUM category superfluous?

 

[Gene Harris]

Here are some initial comments and mark ups I made on the draft comp plan doc.

 

[Gene Harris]

Here are some initial comments and mark ups I made on the draft comp plan doc.

Ok, file is to large so will have to try and break it up into multiple files.

 

[Gene Harris]

try this

 

[Gene Harris]

try this

four more pages

 

[Gene Harris]

Ok, I ran into a problem, now I am unable to add attachments due to "file size to large", even with just one page. Any tech genius' out there with suggestions?